Net Neutrality Vote: FCC Chairman Ajit Pai Jokes About Internet ”Freedom”
This is the beginning of a longer legal battle. That FCC Chairman Pai secured the necessary votes today to completely gut the Commission’s open Internet rules is no surprise, but his gift to the ISPs will be challenged net Neutrality Vote: FCC Chairman Ajit Pai Jokes About Internet ‘Freedom’ court. The Chairman’s position is not based on what’s best for our nation. In his view the future of the Internet should be decided by a few powerful gatekeepers whose monopoly control over Internet access allows them to decide what content reaches viewers.
We are deeply disappointed with the FCC’s decision to repeal net neutrality rules. All lawful internet traffic should be treated equally. The FCC’s ruling is a blow to the creative community and threatens the ability of our members, and other creators, to make their works available to internet users without interference. It benefits no one unless you’re a faceless, mega corporation.
Severe math disabilities exist across ability and achievement levels, even among strong readers successful in other areas—many not identified as LD.
He has acted against the will of a major majority of the American people, left, right and center. He has financial conflicts of interest. 2015 Open Internet Order is a significant setback for the independent sector of the film and television industry and the consumers which we serve. Consumers will be better off, as companies will be able to invest more to serve the best products at the most reasonable prices.
This is the end of the internet as we know it. In Congress and in the courts we must fight back. I’m concerned about any policy that could harm consumer access to the internet. Thank you, Senator, for your leadership.
This represents a radical departure that risks erosion of the biggest free speech platform the world has ever known. Thank you to all who signed my petition for a free Internet! There’s no other way to put this: The Republicans on the FCC who just voted to repeal net neutrality are trying to screw over the American people so a few massive corporations can make more money. 2014: How is this app free? 2015: How is this app free? 2016: How is this app free?
2017: How is this app free? The FCC is handing the keys to the internet to a handful of multi-billion corporations. We were greatly disappointed by today’s assault on a free and open internet. This is a sad day for consumers who already had their internet browsing data for sale. So, the FCC is corrupt trash. Grey’s Anatomy’: Geena Davis Returns To Reprise Dr. The Hollywood Sign is a trademark and intellectual property of Hollywood Chamber of Commerce.
Tap here to turn on desktop notifications to get the news sent straight to you. President, Writers Guild of America, East, 2007-17. The Moyers team has been in the fight for net neutrality from the very beginning. Our documentary Net at Risk was perhaps the first on television to alert the nation to the danger of a corporate takeover of the internet. But every time we think the battle to protect the internet is won, the forces of greed, power and control come right back at us. After he and the Republicans won the 2016 election, Donald Trump appointed Ajit Pai, a former executive from Verizon, to head the FCC.
Treatment for Suicidal Teens
The crucial FCC vote to reverse the net neutrality rules is Thursday, Dec. There remains time to make your voice heard. Follow the instructions in this link to file comments. You can contact your congressional representatives — right now, there’s little chance that the current House and Senate would pass network neutrality legislation, but they do control the FCC’s purse strings. 224-3121, or email them — go to www. For more information on the current state of play, read the piece below by our senior writer, Michael Winship.
Donald Trump seems to irradiate and poison everyone who is sucked into his gravitational pull. There’s a black hole in residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Attorneys engaged in his defense twist themselves into questionable statements and behaviors as special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe draws nearer. Members of Congress surrender their self-esteem and whatever shred of decency they may have left to put forward the plutocrats’ agenda, while pandering to Trump’s hardcore followers for fear of losing campaign donations or being primaried.
Trump’s cave-bear philosophy, such as it is, tends to favor the ideological and theocratic inclinations of people like Vice President Pence and EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt. In that latter category, place the ambitious current chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, Ajit Pai. He was appointed a member of the FCC in 2011, and then named by Trump to take the chair earlier this year. Ever since, Pai has reshaped the commission as a pass-through for the telecommunications giants, giving them virtually everything they want. T and Charter from completely taking over and deciding who can see what on the web, how fast and for how much. Ending net neutrality will squelch competition, innovation and small internet startups, and limit freedom of expression, independent voices and diverse viewpoints. More than ever, Big Business, like Big Brother, will control what you read, see and hear and limit your own ability to speak up and share your opinions, your creativity, your life.
A commission vote has been set for Thursday, Dec. 14, and despite vast and continuing public opposition, the three Republican commissioners, including Pai, seem determined to overrule the two Democrats and once again give the big guys what they want. Pai embraces certain of the more delightful aspects of Trumpism: doublespeak, belittling the other side, blaming everyone else for problems and claiming fake news when presented with the facts. Chairman Pai, this is called projection.
You claim to be preserving internet freedom but in truth your attempt to destroy net neutrality does just the opposite. In pushing your case you’re ignoring the people, the facts and the law. Americans of all political parties overwhelmingly support the values of net neutrality and want to preserve existing net neutrality protections. 200,000 phone calls were made to Congress.
What’s more, Chairman Pai, contrary to your claims that net neutrality has squelched the growth of investment in the internet, there has been a 5-percent increase since the rules were put into effect. On the contrary, says Danny Kimball, who teaches communications and media studies at Goucher College. Title II is precisely the law under which the courts have ruled that the net neutrality rules are valid. So on Thursday the FCC may vote to overturn net neutrality, but that decision will go straight to the courts. Meanwhile, Chairman Pai makes jokes at a Washington dinner about Verizon having groomed him as a Manchurian Candidate to take over the FCC. Get updates on our progress toward building a fairer world.
Vertical”,”id”:”e31b361a7a48a1526e5217b8b3f8b405″,”slug”:”this-new-world”,”name”:”This New World”,”description”:”The current capitalist system is broken. Horizontal”,”id”:”e31b361a7a48a1526e5217b8b3f8b405″,”slug”:”this-new-world”,”name”:”This New World”,”description”:”The current capitalist system is broken. 31b361a7a48a1526e5217b8b3f8b405″,”slug”:”this-new-world”,”name”:”This New World”,”description”:”The current capitalist system is broken. Heather Stewart, The Guardian’s chief stenographer political editor, has copied and pasted a press release written a new article all about “Russian bots”. The trouble is she doesn’t seem to know what either of these words actually means.
Skripal event was never intended to last so long in the public eye? Reality Check: The Guardian Restarts Push for Regime Change in Russia The alleged poisoning of ex-MI6 agent Sergei Skripal has caused the Russophobic MSM to go into overdrive. 14 This comment, written by one of our editors, was censored by the Guardian. 13 This comment was censored by the Guardian. 12 This comment was censored by the Guardian. 11 This comment was censored by the Guardian. 10 These comment were censored by the Guardian.
9 This comment was censored by the Guardian. The evidence for some form of fakery here is now undeniable. Cuban Missiles may not even exist. The 60 Minutes Interview George Soros Tried To Bury Long lost footage of George Soros appearing on 60 Minutes in 1998. World Order 2018 UPDATE March 30 2018: Uploaded to Youtube by Vesti. WATCH: Putin’s FULL Interview with Megyn Kelly on NBC Vladimir Putin interviewed by NBC anchor Megyn Kelly.
The interview was recorded in the Kremlin on March 1, 2018, and in Kaliningrad on March 2, 2018. FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, right, and Verizon executive Kathleen Grillo dream of a Trump presidency in this jokey video sketch from Pai’s appearance at the annual dinner of telecom lawyers in Washington on Dec. Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai probably thought he was adhering to the stand-up comedian’s precept to “know the room” when he launched himself on a jokey, self-deprecating speech last week, complete with a videotaped comedy skit. After all, he was appearing as the featured speaker at the annual dinner of the Federal Communications Bar Assn.
WOODEN TOYS FOR CHILDREN – French blossom
That’s a group of which he was once a member, as an in-house Washington attorney for the big telecommunications firm Verizon. Therefore, he could count on his audience appreciating his inside jokes about prominent members of the telecom bar and the issues they’ve brought to the FCC on behalf of their corporate clients. Leaving aside that many of his quips fell flat, especially a giocoso reference to President Trump’s designation of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel that elicited groans and at least one exclamation of profane disgust audible on the tape, Pai may not have counted on his speech getting beamed to a much larger audience. We want to brainwash and groom a Verizon puppet to install as FCC chairman. That has allowed the general public to ponder whether it’s appropriate for a sitting FCC chairman to make light of controversial regulatory issues in front of a crowd of people clearly favoring one side on those issues.
The telecom attorneys in the audience generally work for companies that will benefit from Pai’s intention to roll back regulations on network neutrality, for example. They include companies such as Verizon, Pai’s former employer. He joined the FCC in 2007, became a commissioner in 2012 and was named chairman by President Trump this year. As it happens, Pai has scheduled a vote for Thursday on his proposal to roll back net neutrality protections imposed by the FCC in 2015—a rollback that would give Verizon and other such telecom firms enormous power over content aimed at internet subscribers in their homes.
Net neutrality is the principle that an internet service provider—the firm that carries internet data the last mile into your home or business—can’t favor some content providers’ data over others’. All video streams, for instance, are supposed to be brought at the same speed and quality into your home, whether the source is Netflix, Joe’s video, or the ISP’s own service. Not only the policy but the haste with which Pai is pushing it through has come under attack. Tom Wheeler, Pai’s predecessor and the architect of the 2015 policy, this week.
I remember the days when Chairman Pai was a commissioner who claimed to be a champion of prudence and process,” Wheeler wrote. Back then, of course, he was in the minority. With Republicans in control of the FCC and Congress, “process and prudencehave given away to ideology. Verizon in 2003, when Pai was still on the Verizon staff.
More Halloween type pumpkin poems:
It’s not unusual for top federal officials to poke fun at themselves at public events— the annual White House Correspondents Assn. But it’s a bit different to hear a top regulator cozying up to the very people he’s supposed to be regulating—especially since Pai’s policies already have been judged to unduly benefit big incumbent internet service providers like Verizon. In his talk, Pai made light of the net neutrality debate, but the issue is important to the free flow of ideas and entertainment and information content over the internet. The issue also involves billions of dollars in potential profits for Verizon and other firms positioned to act as gatekeepers of internet content, possibly favoring their own content at the expense of outsiders’.
Pai has made no secret of the fact that his plan would facilitate more of that, though he asserts it would leave plenty of room for regulators to lower the boom on abusers. But what especially concerns advocates of net neutrality regulation is his plan for the FCC to turn such regulation over to the FTC. A draft memorandum of understanding between the two agencies announced Monday by Pai and the GOP-controlled FTC failed to quell those concerns. The memo says the FTC will have the responsibility to “investigate and take enforcement action as appropriate against Internet service providers for unfair, deceptive, or otherwise unlawful acts or practices. T, Comcast, Verizon and others from both FCC oversight and FTC oversight.
FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn, a Democrat, detected the same flaw, calling the memo “a confusing, lackluster, reactionary afterthought: an attempt to paper over weaknesses in the chairman’s draft proposal repealing the FCC’s 2015 net neutrality rules. The FCC already has a stronger arrangement with the FTC in place, she pointed out—Pai’s efforts would simply weaken it. A similar point was raised by 41 consumer advocacy organizations and agencies in a Dec. Pai dismissed the letter as a “desperate” attempt “to defeat Chairman Pai’s plan to restore internet freedom. That’s his description of a plan that would cede immense commercial powers to a handful of big corporations.
What often gets lost in the debate over network neutrality is the genesis of the policy that Pai is proposing to overturn. Who brought the lawsuits, on which the judges ruled? Big ISPs, one of which was, yes, Verizon. Laugh now if you think Pai’s connections to that company are a big joke. Keep up to date with Michael Hiltzik. A look back, and ahead, at the latest California business news.
You are now following this newsletter. Federal Communications Commission unveiled plans on Tuesday to repeal landmark 2015 rules that prohibited internet service providers from impeding consumer access to web content in a move that promises to recast the digital landscape. FCC chief Ajit Pai, a Republican appointed by President Donald Trump in January, said the commission will vote at a Dec. 14 meeting on his plan to rescind the so-called net neutrality rules championed by Democratic former President Barack Obama that treated internet service providers like public utilities. The rules barred broadband providers from blocking or slowing down access to content or charging consumers more for certain content. They were intended to ensure a free and open internet, give consumers equal access to web content and prevent broadband service providers from favoring their own content.
Helping your partner build a relationship with your daughter
T Inc, Comcast Corp and Verizon Communications Inc that opposed the rules and gives them sweeping powers to decide what web content consumers can get and at what price. It represents a setback for Google parent Alphabet Inc and Facebook Inc, which had urged Pai not to rescind the rules. With three Republican and two Democratic commissioners, the move is all but certain to be approved. Trump, a Republican, expressed his opposition to net neutrality in 2014 before the regulations were even implemented, calling it a ‘power grab’ by Obama. Pai said his proposal would prevent state and local governments from creating their own net neutrality rules because internet service is ‘inherently an interstate service. The preemption is most likely to handcuff Democratic-governed states and localities that could have considered their own plans to protect consumers’ equal access to internet content. The FCC will no longer be in the business of micromanaging business models and preemptively prohibiting services and applications and products that could be pro-competitive,’ Pai said in an interview, adding that the Obama administration had sought to pick winners and losers and exercised ‘heavy-handed’ regulation of the internet.
We should simply set rules of the road that let companies of all kinds in every sector compete and let consumers decide who wins and loses,’ Pai added. Tom Wheeler, who headed the FCC under Obama and advocated for the net neutrality rules, called the planned repeal ‘a shameful sham and sellout. Even for this FCC and its leadership, this proposal raises hypocrisy to new heights. T, Comcast and Verizon have said that repealing the rules could lead to billions of dollars in additional broadband investment and eliminate the possibility that a future presidential administration could regulate internet pricing. Verizon said it believed the FCC ‘will reinstate a framework that protects consumers’ access to the open internet, without forcing them to bear the heavy costs from unnecessary regulation. The Internet Association, representing major technology firms including Alphabet and Facebook, said Pai’s proposal ‘represents the end of net neutrality as we know it and defies the will of millions of Americans. This proposal undoes nearly two decades of bipartisan agreement on baseline net neutrality principles that protect Americans’ ability to access the entire internet,’ it said.
Pai’s proposal would require internet service providers to disclose whether they allow blocking or slowing down of consumer web access or permit so-called internet fast lanes to facilitate a practice called paid prioritization of charging for certain content. Such disclosure will make it easier for another agency, the Federal Trade Commission, to act against internet service providers that fail to disclose such conduct to consumers, Pai said. The group praised Pai’s decision to remove ‘antiquated, restrictive regulations’ to ‘pave the way for broadband network investment, expansion and upgrades. The FCC’s repeal is certain to draw a legal challenge from advocates of net neutrality.
House of Representatives Democrat, said the FCC move would hurt consumers and chill competition, saying the agency ‘has launched an all-out assault on the entrepreneurship, innovation and competition at the heart of the internet. Republican Senator John Thune said Pai’s plan was an improvement over the Obama rules but that ‘the only way to create long-term certainty for the internet ecosystem is for Congress to pass a bipartisan law. The planned repeal represents the latest example of a legacy achievement of Obama being erased since Trump took office in January. Trump has abandoned international trade deals, the landmark Paris climate accord and environmental protections, taken aim at the Iran nuclear accord and closer relations with Cuba, and sought repeal Obama’s signature healthcare law. Pai, who has moved quickly to undo numerous regulatory actions since becoming FCC chairman, is pushing a broad deregulatory agenda. Pai said he had not shared his plans on the rollback with the White House in advance or been directed to undo net neutrality by White House officials.
The FCC under Obama regulated internet service providers like public utilities under a section of federal law that gave the agency sweeping oversight over the conduct of these companies. Language in the new proposal would give the FCC significantly less authority to oversee the web. The FCC granted initial approval to Pai’s plan in May, but had left open many key questions including whether to retain any legal requirements limiting internet providers conduct. His plan also would eliminate the ‘internet conduct standard,’ which gave the FCC far-reaching discretion to prohibit internet service provider practices deemed to violate a list of factors and sought to address future discriminatory conduct.
The comments below have not been moderated. We are no longer accepting comments on this article. Intimidated by the thought of taming your garden for summer? Rochelle Humes powers through London Marathon as she completes her first 26. Gordon Ramsay’s twins Jack and Holly, 18, complete first London Marathon as he celebrates impressive 4. Pippa’s timely baby news shifts spotlight from troubled father-in-law to his VERY different sons but she reach out to Vogue after wedding ban? An oily secuder and a flirty heiress: This is REAL Victorian melodrama!
I want to make sure I respond to it in the appropriate way! Will Meghan’s ‘something borrowed’ be from Diana? Enter the terms you wish to search for. Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai is facing an online backlash after joking about the implications of repealing net neutrality. Pai said in the video’s introduction.
Choose A Side In The Infinity War With This Marvel Wall Art
Here are just a few of the things you’ll still be able to do on the internet after these Obama-era regulations are repealed. William Hughes, a writer for entertainment website the A. Beyond his being labeled a Trump puppet, critics have accused Pai of being a shill for Verizon, his former company, as the telecom giant has spent millions on lobbying to have the net neutrality regulations repealed. He added that he has received racist abuse as a result of his stance on net neutrality.
This $13 value Lifestorming eBook is free until tomorrow, April 19
The discourse has been unbelievably mired in a sewer. Choose a Membership That’s Perfect for You! Enter the terms you wish to search for. Cancel the funeral and get ready to fight: Net neutrality is far from dead. Our elected officials in Congress have the power to reverse what is swiftly becoming one of the U.
And if they don’t, they’ll pay for it come election season. Outside of Washington, DC, net neutrality is not a partisan issue. Voters from across the political spectrum overwhelmingly agree that they don’t want their cable companies controlling where they get news, how they stream music and videos, or which apps they use to pay for things, get directions, or communicate with friends and family. But after all of that, they’ve completely failed to build any real grassroots support for their attack on net neutrality, from the left or the right. And every member of Congress knows that. FCC Chairman Ajit Pai pointed the finger at companies like Twitter, Facebook, and Google, who many on both the right and left feel already have too much control over online speech.
But the FCC’s vote only makes that situation worse. No matter how hard they try, telecom lobbyists will just never convince a meaningful number of Republican voters that killing net neutrality , and ending the internet as a free market of ideas, is a good thing. And that’s what gives us a unique chance to get our normally gridlocked Congress to take action and overrule the FCC’s politically toxic order. The next phase of the fight will be the most important, and potentially the most dangerous. We don’t need legislation that’s been watered down with kool-aid.
The FCC did something that a supermajority of people in this country oppose. The internet makes the impossible possible. Choose a Membership That’s Perfect for You! This is the beginning of a longer legal battle. That FCC Chairman Pai secured the necessary votes today to completely gut the Commission’s open Internet rules is no surprise, but his gift to the ISPs will be challenged in court. The Chairman’s position is not based on what’s best for our nation. In his view the future of the Internet should be decided by a few powerful gatekeepers whose monopoly control over Internet access allows them to decide what content reaches viewers.