America”s Children: Key National Indicators of Well-Being, 2017

22nd June 2018OffByRiseNews

We have america’s Children: Key National Indicators of Well-Being, 2017 a tipping point. Inequality can no longer be treated as an afterthought.

We need to focus the debate on how the benefits of growth are distributed. The OECD Centre for Opportunity and Equality is a platform for promoting and conducting policy-oriented research on the trends, causes and consequences of inequalities in society and the economy, and a forum to discuss how policies can best address such inequalities. The work of the Centre can be found below. Income inequality in OECD countries is at its highest level for the past half century. OECD, up from seven times 25 years ago.

The Living Planet – Ep. 14

Only in Turkey, Chile, and Mexico has inequality fallen, but in the latter two countries the incomes of the richest are still more than 25 times those of the poorest. In emerging economies, such as China and India, a sustained period of strong economic growth has helped lift millions of people out of absolute poverty. But the benefits of growth have not been evenly distributed and high levels of income inequality have risen further. Among the dynamic emerging economies, only Brazil managed to strongly reduce inequality, but the gap between rich and poor is still about five times that in the OECD countries. The OECD analyses trends in inequality and poverty for advanced and emerging economies. It examines the drivers of growing inequalities, such as globalisation, skill-biased technological change and changes in countries’ policy approaches. And it assesses the effectiveness and efficiency of a wide range of policies, including education, labour market and social policies, in tackling poverty and promoting more inclusive growth.

Does income inequality hurt economic growth? Top Incomes and Taxation in OECD Countries: Was the crisis a game changer? Breaking down barriers to gender equality in education, employment and entrepreneurship would create new sources of economic growth and help make better use of everyone’s skills. Greater educational attainment has accounted for about half of the economic growth in OECD countries in the past 50 years, in large part thanks to an increase in girls reaching higher levels of education and greater gender equality in the number of years spent in school. Companies with a higher proportion of women in top management do better than others.

Women occupy less than a fifth of parliamentary seats around the world and their access to top positions in companies is even worse. The impact of pay inequality is dramatic over a woman’s lifetime. Having worked less in formal employment, but having carried out much more unpaid work at home, many women will retire on lower pensions and see out their final years in poverty. Living an average of nearly 6 years longer than men, women over 65 are today more than one and a half times more likely to live in poverty than men in the same age bracket. What Lies Behind Gender Inequality in Education? As pre-tax income inequality increases, the role of tax policy will only grow more important.

Maintaining the overall progressivity of the tax code is a key priority in this regard. Reducing social security contributions and payroll taxes on low-income workers, to encourage them to stay in the labour force and boost their skills, and to make them more attractive for companies to hire. Developing policies to improve transparency and tax compliance, including continued support of the international efforts, led by the OECD, to ensure the Automatic Exchange of Tax Information between tax authorities. Progress in health status and life expectancy in OECD countries and in emerging economies has been remarkable, but not even. Large inequalities exist not only across countries, but also between population groups within each country. Inequalities in health status are due to many factors, including differences in living and working conditions and in behavioural factors, but also in access to and quality of health care. Greater emphasis on public health and disease prevention, along with improved access to health services, can improve the health status and life expectancy of disadvantaged groups.

America's Children: Key National Indicators of Well-Being, 2017

Baby Hazel Mischief Time

Most OECD countries have endorsed, as major policy objectives, the reduction of inequalities in health status and the principle of equal access to health care based on need. Inequalities which surface in the job-market are often entrenched during education, which puts those at the bottom at a serious disadvantage. Poorer students struggle to compete with their wealthier classmates and go on to lower levels of educational attainment, smaller salaries, and most strikingly, shorter lives. Investing in education and training will pay long-term dividends for the economy, for individual well-being, and for the overall prosperity of our societies. Reaching excellence through equity is possible. For that, we need to develop more ambitious education and skills policies.

PIAAC initiatives highlight large inequalities in education and skills. They also demonstrate that there are major potential benefits to equip disadvantaged groups, such as low social-background students and low-skilled workers, to acquire better skills and compete for better-paying jobs. How can education help tackle rising income inequality? How Pronounced Is Income Inequality Around the World – And How Can Education Help Reduce It?

10 Core Exercises that Also Strengthen the Back »

Innovation and entrepreneurship are major potential sources of growth with strong spillover benefits across the economy. But in the past, innovation policies have generally been assessed in terms of their impact on aggregate income growth. As a result, it is essential to consider the social, industrial and territorial implications of innovation policies as well. This is especially important if the changes inherent in the innovation process exacerbate income disparities by creating opportunities primarily for high-skilled workers. Inequality is closely linked to where people live and work. The economic crisis has widened inequalities across regions within countries. The spatial concentration of income inequality has been increasing everywhere.

In advanced economies, income inequality is highest within large cities, with large disparities in income from one area of a city to another. Evidence shows that the factors that most influence peoples’ well-being are local issues, such as employment, access to health services, pollution and security. So, the policy responses must also be locally targeted. Policies that take better account of regional problems and needs may have a greater impact on improving well-being for the country as a whole by tackling the sources of inequality more directly.

Inequality is a key driver of individual and country’s well-being and this is why inequality is one of the distinctive features of the OECD well-being measurement framework adopted in the OECD Better Life Initiative. Better Life Index, which is another pillar of the OECD Better Life Initiative, also documents inequalities in selected well-being dimensions. It notably shows gender inequalities in well-being and well-being disparities due to socio-economic gaps. TFAH works on a variety of issues to help protect the health of every community and make disease prevention a national priority.

Major vulnerabilities remain in our preparedness to respond to health emergencies, including bioterrorism, natural disasters, chronic diseases and emerging infectious diseases. Learn more about our policy work with Congress and the Administration and how you can take action to support public health. Together we can take action today to prevent people from becoming sick tomorrow. Make your tax-deductible gift online today. To sign up for Wellness and Prevention in Health Reform Digest, please fill out this form.

Huffy Men’s Tactic 29″ 15-Speed Mountain Bicycle

Although he has only been in office a few months, Donald Trump’s presidency has had a major impact on how the world sees the United States. Trump and many of his key policies are broadly unpopular around the globe, and ratings for the U. Trump to do the right thing when it comes to international affairs. The sharp decline in how much global publics trust the U. In countries where confidence in the U. Since 2002, when Pew Research Center first asked about America’s image abroad, favorable opinion of the U.

Blue Shark Fin Rain Boot – Kids

Prior to this spring, one of the biggest shifts in attitudes toward the U. At that time, positive views of the U. Europe and other regions, as did trust in how the new president would handle world affairs. Even though the 2017 shift in views of the U.

The prevailing view among the 37 countries surveyed is that their country’s relationship with the U. Among those who do anticipate a change, however, more predict relations will worsen, rather than improve. Confidence in President Trump is influenced by reactions to both his policies and his character. With regard to the former, some of his signature policy initiatives are widely opposed around the globe. His plan to build a wall along the U. Similar levels of global opposition greet Trump’s policy stances on withdrawing from international trade agreements and climate change accords. And most across the nations surveyed also disapprove of the new administration’s efforts to restrict entry into the U.

Trump’s intention to back away from the nuclear weapons agreement with Iran meets less opposition than his other policy initiatives, but even here publics around the world disapprove of such an action by a wide margin. Trump’s character is also a factor in how he is viewed abroad. In the eyes of most people surveyed around the world, the White House’s new occupant is arrogant, intolerant and even dangerous. Among the positive characteristics tested, his highest rating is for being a strong leader. Fewer believe he is charismatic, well-qualified or cares about ordinary people.

America’s overall image benefits from a substantial reservoir of goodwill. Washington respects the personal freedoms of its people. These are among the major findings from a new Pew Research Center survey conducted among 40,448 respondents in 37 countries outside the U. The drop in favorability ratings for the United States is widespread. The share of the public with a positive view of the U. Latin America, North America, Europe, Asia and Africa. Favorability ratings have only increased in Russia and Vietnam.

Today, in many countries, ratings for President Trump look very similar to those for Bush at the end of his term. This pattern is especially clear in Western Europe. In the UK, France, Germany and Spain, the low levels of confidence in Trump are very similar to the poor ratings for Bush in 2008. Xi and Merkel are somewhat less well-known than Trump and Putin. Roughly one-in-five globally do not offer an opinion about the Chinese and German leaders. On questions throughout this report, median percentages are reported to help readers see overall patterns.

University of Central Florida

The median is the middle number in a list of figures sorted in ascending or descending order. In a survey of 37 countries, the median result is the 19th on a list of country-level findings ranked in order. For example, we can look at European medians across 10 countries, where the median is the average of the fifth and sixth figures when the countries are listed from highest to lowest. Most disapprove of Trump’s policies The 2017 survey examines attitudes toward five major policy proposals that President Trump has supported. Globally, none of them are popular. As a candidate, Trump repeatedly pledged to withdraw the U. Iran, though he has yet to do so as president.

On balance, global publics oppose this idea. Only in Israel and Jordan do majorities support U. About a third globally express support for Trump’s proposed ban on people entering the U. Opposition is especially strong in several countries with Muslim-majority populations, including Jordan, Lebanon and Senegal.

The survey, which was conducted before Trump officially announced that the U. Trump’s plan to build a wall between the U. Mexicans oppose the wall, and the wall is strongly rejected throughout Latin America, as well as in much of Europe. There is no country among the 37 surveyed in which a majority endorses a border wall between the U.

The world’s wider view of America Attitudes toward the U. American foreign policy have a major impact on how people around the world view the United States, but other factors are important too. The American people are core to how the U. Overall, Americans are seen more positively than the U. Positive views are especially common in Asia and Europe.

You may also like…

Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon are the only nations polled where majorities express an unfavorable opinion of Americans. Along with its citizens, America’s popular culture is often well-regarded abroad. Roughly two-thirds across the countries surveyed like American music, movies and television. Europeans and Asians are particularly likely to find U.

The Brighton School

But America’s influence around the world is not always welcome. As with several other aspects of U. Prevailing view is that relations with U. In many countries, a majority or plurality believes relations will remain about the same. However, in most regions of the world, the share of the public that believes things will worsen outweighs the share that thinks relations will improve by a ratio of two-to-one.

While relatively few say they expect relations to improve, more than half hold this view in Russia and Israel. Country spotlights: Russia, Israel, Germany, Mexico, Canada Looking at findings on U. American president in Russia, Israel, Germany, Mexico and Canada illustrates different patterns Pew Research Center surveys have discovered over time regarding attitudes toward the U. In survey after survey, Israelis give the U. Germany: Dramatic shift in views of American president, U.

America’s image has turned negative in the two nations with which it shares a border. Trump receives dramatically lower ratings than his predecessor in Canada. Canadians now have a positive view of the U. Around the world, favorability of U.

Teaching the Montessori alphabet

5 facts about illegal immigration in the U. Are you in the American middle class? About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions.